Healthcare policy is facing a perfect storm. Here's what you should know

The healthcare sector stands at the precipice of its most significant policy-driven transformation from the passage of OBBBA since the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010.

A confluence of federal funding shifts, coverage losses and operational pressures is creating what industry experts describe as a "perfect storm" that will fundamentally reshape healthcare real estate demand patterns across the United States.

Healthcare providers are grappling with the largest policy disruption in over a decade, facing a triple financial threat that strikes at the core of their operational stability. The numbers paint a stark picture: 10-14 million Americans could potentially lose insurance coverage over the next decade if ACA subsidies expire, while Medicaid faces its biggest cuts since the program's founding in 1965.

This isn't a gradual shift that organizations can ease into—the first wave of impacts is set to hit in 2026, giving healthcare systems precious little time to adapt their strategies and real estate portfolios accordingly.

The federal funding landscape has already begun its dramatic transformation. The Department of Health and Human Services has seen its budget decreased by $33.3 billion, while VA medical care received a $3.3 billion increase. This reallocation signals a clear shift in federal priorities, with traditional healthcare funding streams facing unprecedented pressure.

Perhaps most concerning for research-intensive institutions, NIH funding delays are creating additional stress across both large health systems and smaller community providers. Academic medical centers, now face the dual challenge of reduced clinical revenue and constrained research funding. Uncertainty looms over future NIH funding, with the White House pushing to disperse fewer grants and Congress potentially wanting to keep funding steady.

The impact of these policy changes won't be felt equally across all markets. Coverage losses are expected to concentrate heavily in Florida, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas—Medicaid non-expansion states that represent significant healthcare real estate markets. Non-Medicaid expansion states face particularly acute vulnerability, as they lack the safety net that Medicaid expansion provides to buffer against federal policy changes.

This geographic concentration creates both challenges and opportunities for healthcare real estate stakeholders. While some markets face heightened impacts, others may emerge as relative safe havens for investment and expansion.

“While insurance coverage remains the primary gatekeeper to healthcare access, our research reveals striking geographic disparities that make convenience and proximity even more critical for patient outcomes."

- Cheryl Carron, COO of Work Dynamics Americas and President of the Healthcare Division at JLL.

The financial implications for healthcare providers span a troubling spectrum. Margin impacts for health systems are projected to compress from 8 - 18% points, according to Advisory Board – on the lower range for large systems with a lower percent of Medicaid patients and on the higher end of the range for smaller systems and those with a higher percent of Medicaid patients. Rural providers, which tend to be smaller, less well-capitalized, and have a higher government payer mix face the greatest risk in this environment. These organizations often operate on thin margins even in favorable conditions, making them particularly vulnerable to the current policy shifts.

The pressure extends beyond direct reimbursement cuts. Hospital systems are already reconsidering their capital plans due to budget constraints, while systems with significant Medicare populations are actively considering campus consolidation as a cost-containment strategy.

The healthcare delivery network itself is showing signs of stress that directly impact real estate utilization patterns. According to Advisory Board, plan-provider negotiation disputes surged by 69% between 2022 and 2023, reflecting the growing tension between payers and providers over reimbursement terms.

This tension has real consequences for healthcare facilities and real estate. Nearly 20% of health systems have already stopped accepting one or more Medicare Advantage plans, while 60% are considering dropping MA plans within the next two years, according to Advisory Board. Such decisions can dramatically alter patient flow patterns and utilization rates across healthcare spaces.

Beyond reimbursement challenges, healthcare organizations face mounting operational cost pressures that affect their real estate decisions. Advisory Board reports that tariffs on medical supplies are creating cost increases of 15% or more for hospitals over just six months. Meanwhile, 94% of healthcare administrators expect delays in equipment upgrades, which can affect space utilization and facility modernization plans.

Advisory Board also reports that the 340B drug program, which has experienced 129.4% growth in drug sales from 2018 to 2023, now faces potential reimbursement cuts that threaten safety-net hospitals. This program has been a crucial revenue source for many hospitals serving vulnerable populations, and its curtailment could force difficult decisions about facility operations and real estate footprints.

The convergence of these factors creates distinct implications for different segments of the healthcare real estate market. Rural providors and those that rely heavily on Medicaid reimbursements face high distress probability even with the $50B in funding the OBBBA allocated to rural hospitals, as they typically serve populations with higher rates of government insurance and operate with limited financial reserves.

Academic medical centers confront research funding pressures that could affect their ability to maintain extensive campus footprints. These institutions may need to reconsider their real estate strategies, potentially consolidating operations or divesting non-essential properties.

Safety-net hospitals face an increased uncompensated care burden as more patients lose insurance coverage. This growing financial pressure could accelerate closure decisions or force significant downsizing of operations.

Despite the challenges, opportunities exist for healthcare real estate investors and operators. Medicaid expansion states will be less affected compared to their non-expansion counterparts. Urban markets may present portfolio optimization opportunities as financially stressed systems seek to optimize their portfolios.

Specialty care facilities demonstrate less exposure to policy changes, as they typically serve a more commercially insured patient base and face fewer direct government reimbursement pressures.

Investors should prioritize credit analysis and tenant financial health monitoring in this environment. Focusing on essential service providers with a diversified payer mix can provide greater resilience to policy changes. The traditional approach of evaluating healthcare real estate based primarily on location and physical characteristics must evolve to include deeper analysis of tenant financial stability and payer mix diversification. Geographic exposure to policy-resilient markets becomes a critical factor in portfolio construction and risk management.

For healthcare providers, the current environment demands accelerated strategic partnerships and network optimization. Organizations can no longer afford to operate in isolation—collaborative approaches to service delivery and cost management become essential survival strategies. Additionally, providers must evaluate their real estate footprint efficiency with fresh eyes. Properties that made sense in a more favorable reimbursement environment may no longer justify their carrying costs. Strategic consolidation could improve operational efficiency while reducing overhead.

Healthcare systems should also prepare for increased competition for commercially insured patients. This competition may drive location and facility decisions, as providers seek to position themselves advantageously in markets with higher commercial payer penetration.

"For providers, strategic location decisions can mean the difference between financial sustainability and organizational survival.”

- Matt Coursen, U.S. Healthcare Lead, Leasing Advisory.

The healthcare sector's policy-driven transformation represents more than a cyclical downturn—it marks a fundamental shift in how healthcare delivery and real estate intersect. Resilient healthcare organizations will be determined by geography, payer mix and operational efficiency rather than traditional market factors alone.

Stakeholders must adapt quickly to navigate this unprecedented disruption. The organizations that emerge strongest from this period will be those that embrace strategic flexibility, prioritize financial resilience and make data-driven decisions about their real estate portfolios.

The perfect storm currently engulfing healthcare real estate demands immediate attention and strategic response. Those who act decisively to align their real estate strategies with the new policy reality will be best positioned to weather the current disruption and capitalize on the opportunities that emerge from market transformation.

Interested in connecting with one of our healthcare real estate experts? Reach out to schedule a meeting.